Ford v. Hall

Full title: KELVIN FORD, Plaintiff, v. ACTING WARDEN HALL, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 6, 2022

CIVIL 4:21-cv-2081 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 6, 2022)

Opinion

CIVIL 4:21-cv-2081

04-06-2022

KELVIN FORD, Plaintiff, v. ACTING WARDEN HALL, et al., Defendants.

Sylvia H. Rambo United States District Judge

ORDER

Sylvia H. Rambo United States District Judge

AND NOW, this 6^th day of April, 2022, upon consideration of the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6), to which no objections have been timely filed, and the court having satisfied itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record, Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see also Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Intern., Inc., 702 F.Supp.2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010) (explaining that judges should review dispositive legal issues raised by the report for clear error), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1) The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;

2) Plaintiff's Motion requesting that this case be held in abeyance or dismissed so that he can exhaust his administrative remedies (Doc. 5) is construed as a notice of dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(1); and

3) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.