From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. Gross

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 12, 2021
2:21-cv-1095 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1095 TLN AC P

08-12-2021

LARRY FORD, Plaintiff, v. GROSS, Defendant.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

On July 28, 2021, the court issued findings and recommendations which (1) denied plaintiff's motion to stay this action pending the exhaustion of his administrative remedies and (2) recommended that this action be dismissed for failure to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or in the alternative, to pay the filing fee. ECF No. 12. Plaintiff was given twenty-one days to file objections to the order. See id. at 3.

On August 6, 2021, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. See ECF No. 13. In his objections, plaintiff acknowledges that he has yet to exhaust his administrative remedies and therefore asks that this action be dismissed. See id. at 2.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued July 28, 2021 (ECF No. 12), are VACATED;

2. Pursuant to plaintiffs request, ECF No. 13 at 2, this matter is VOLUNTARILY DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i); and

3. This case is CLOSED.


Summaries of

Ford v. Gross

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 12, 2021
2:21-cv-1095 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Ford v. Gross

Case Details

Full title:LARRY FORD, Plaintiff, v. GROSS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 12, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-1095 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2021)