From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FORD v. GAUL

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Mar 2, 2010
2010 Ohio 782 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 94501.

RELEASE DATE: March 2, 2010.

Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 430679, Order No. 431220.

WRIT DENIED.

Jerry Ford, pro se, Inmate # 554-925, Grafton Correctional Institution, for Relator.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecutor, By: James E. Moss, Assistant County Prosecutor, Attorneys for Respondent.


JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION


{¶ 1} Jerry Ford, the relator, has filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Ford seeks an order from this court, which requires Judge Daniel Gaul, and Robert Reid, Cuyahoga County Sheriff, the respondents, to "journalize a Journal Entry that reflects the total amount of jail-time credit owed to Ford in case number CR-06-490058, which is one-hundred and ninety (190) days." Judge Gaul and Sheriff Robert Reid have filed a joint motion for summary judgment.

{¶ 2} In order for this court to issue a writ of mandamus, Ford must demonstrate that (1) he possesses a clear legal right to a journal entry that specifies jail-time credit in the amount of one hundred and ninety days, (2) Judge Gaul possesses a clear duty to issue a journal entry that specifies jail-time credit in the amount of one hundred and ninety (190) days, and (3) there exists no other adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State ex rel. Asti v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Servs., 107 Ohio St.3d 262, 2005-Ohio-6432, 838 N.E.2d 658; State ex rel. Nichols v. Cuyahoga Bd. of Mental Retardation Dev. Disabilities, 72 Ohio St.3d 205, 1995-Ohio-215, 648 N.E.2d 823.

{¶ 3} Attached to the joint motion for summary judgment, is a copy of a journal entry, as journalized on June 25, 2009, which clearly demonstrates that Ford has been granted jail-time credit in State v. Ford, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-490058. Judge Gaul has discharged his duty to issue a journal entry that specifies the amount of jail-time credit to be awarded Ford in Case No. CR-490058. In addition, once Judge Gaul has specified the a number of days of jail-time credit, Ford possesses or possessed an adequate remedy at law through a direct appeal to this court. State ex rel. Ponsky v. Koch, Cuyahoga App. No. 92437, 2009-Ohio-339; State ex rel. Flakes v. Russo, Cuyahoga App. No. 94044, 2009-Ohio-6474.

{¶ 4} Accordingly, we grant the respondents' joint motion for summary judgment. Costs to Ford. It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Eighth District Court of Appeals serve notice of this judgment upon all parties as required by Civ. R. 58(B).

Writ denied.

SEAN C. GALLAGHER, A.J., and ANN DYKE, J., CONCUR.


Summaries of

FORD v. GAUL

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Mar 2, 2010
2010 Ohio 782 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

FORD v. GAUL

Case Details

Full title:State of Ohio, ex rel. Jerry Ford, Relator, v. Judge Daniel Gaul, et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County

Date published: Mar 2, 2010

Citations

2010 Ohio 782 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010)