From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. Conklin

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 22, 2001
781 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 2001)

Opinion

No. SC96152.

Opinion filed February 22, 2001.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Great Public Importance First District — Case No. 1D98-2804.

Nancy A. Lauten of Fowler, White, Gillen, Boggs, Villareal Banker, P.A., Tampa, Florida for Petitioners.

Vicki L. Stolberg of Barrs, Williamson, Stolberg, Townsend Gonzalez, P.A., Tampa, Florida, for Respondent


We have for review a decision on the following question of great public importance certified by the First District Court of Appeal in Conklin v. Ford, 737 So.2d 602 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999):

WHERE AN EMPLOYER TAKES A WORKERS' COMPENSATION OFFSET UNDER SECTION 440.20(15), FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), AND INITIALLY INCLUDES SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS PAID UNDER SECTION 440.15(1)(e)1, FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), IS THE EMPLOYER ENTITLED TO RECALCULATE THE OFFSET BASED ON THE YEARLY 5% INCREASE IN SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS?

We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in City of Clearwater v. Acker, 755 So.2d 597 (Fla. 1999), we answer the certified question in the negative and approve the First District's decision in this case.

It is so ordered.

Wells, C.J., and Shaw, Harding, Anstead, Pariente and Lewis, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Ford v. Conklin

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 22, 2001
781 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 2001)
Case details for

Ford v. Conklin

Case Details

Full title:ERNIE HAIRE FORD, et al., Petitioners, v. SHERRY CONKLIN, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 22, 2001

Citations

781 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 2001)