From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. Carkeek

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Nov 9, 1938
29 Cal.App.2d 55 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)

Opinion

Docket No. 12045.

November 9, 1938.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Thurmond Clarke, Judge. Appeal dismissed on motion.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

No appearance for Appellant.

Syril S. Tipton for Respondents.


THE COURT.

[1] This case comes before us on motion to dismiss for failure of the appellant to file a transcript of the record within the time allowed by law and for failure to file a brief. The motion is accompanied by a clerk's certificate.

The motion is good; appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Ford v. Carkeek

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Nov 9, 1938
29 Cal.App.2d 55 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)
Case details for

Ford v. Carkeek

Case Details

Full title:MARY FORD, Appellant, v. STANLEY CARKEEK et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Nov 9, 1938

Citations

29 Cal.App.2d 55 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)
84 P.2d 54