From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. Acme Roof Decks, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 28, 1964
168 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 1964)

Opinion

No. 33530.

October 28, 1964.

Writ of certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Richard A. Sicking and Kaplan, Ser, Abrams O'Malley, Miami, for petitioner.

Lally, Miller Hodges, Miami, for respondent Acme Roof Decks, Inc., and Hartford Accident Indemnity Co.

Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondent Florida Industrial Commission.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 24, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ford v. Acme Roof Decks, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 28, 1964
168 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 1964)
Case details for

Ford v. Acme Roof Decks, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LEILA FORD, PETITIONER, v. ACME ROOF DECKS, INC., HARTFORD ACCIDENT…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 28, 1964

Citations

168 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 1964)