From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Forcades v. McGrady

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 24, 2010
CIVIL ACTION No. 09-5502 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 24, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 09-5502.

November 24, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 23rd day of November, 2010, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (paper no. 1) and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell (paper no. 16), it is ORDERED that:

1. No objections having been filed, the Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is DENIED ON THE MERITS as to Claim No. 3 (subpart 1), and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Claim Nos. 1, 2, 3 (subparts 2 through 7), 4, and 5 for procedural default, as explained in the Report and Recommendation.
3. There is no basis to issue a certificate of appealability.
4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this action CLOSED.


Summaries of

Forcades v. McGrady

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 24, 2010
CIVIL ACTION No. 09-5502 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 24, 2010)
Case details for

Forcades v. McGrady

Case Details

Full title:FELIX FORCADES v. JAMES J. McGRADY, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 24, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 09-5502 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 24, 2010)