From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Forbes v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division
Apr 7, 2010
Case No. 3:09-cv-630-J-32TEM, 3:99-cr-222-J-32TEM (M.D. Fla. Apr. 7, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-cv-630-J-32TEM, 3:99-cr-222-J-32TEM.

April 7, 2010


ORDER


This cause is before the Court on petitioner Trevor O. Forbes's ("Petitioner") Application for a Certificate of Appealability (Doc. 15). On April 24, 1996, the President signed into law amendments to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244, 2253, 2254, 2255, Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22, and 21 U.S.C. § 848(q). As a result, this Court should grant an application for a certificate of appealability only if Petitioner makes a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. To make this substantial showing, Petitioner "must demonstrate that the issues are debatable among jurists of reason" or "that a court could resolve the issues [differently]." Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 n. 4 (1983) (citation omitted). In addition, Petitioner could show "the questions are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further." Id.

Specifically, where a district court has rejected a prisoner's constitutional claims on the merits, the petitioner must demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Hernandez v. Johnson, 213 F.3d 243, 248 (5th Cir.),cert. denied, 531 U.S. 966 (2000). When the district court has rejected a claim on procedural grounds, the petitioner must show that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484; Franklin v. Hightower, 215 F.3d 1196, 1199 (11th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1009 (2001). Here, based on the Court's review of the motions filed, the Orders rendered and the issues raised in the Application for Certificate of Appealability, the Petitioner has failed to satisfy the applicable Slack test. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED:

Petitioner's Application for Certificate of Appealability (Doc. 15) is DENIED. The Clerk shall close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED at Jacksonville, Florida.


Summaries of

Forbes v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division
Apr 7, 2010
Case No. 3:09-cv-630-J-32TEM, 3:99-cr-222-J-32TEM (M.D. Fla. Apr. 7, 2010)
Case details for

Forbes v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:TREVOR O. FORBES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division

Date published: Apr 7, 2010

Citations

Case No. 3:09-cv-630-J-32TEM, 3:99-cr-222-J-32TEM (M.D. Fla. Apr. 7, 2010)