From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foote v. Tanner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 15, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-102-JWD-RLB (M.D. La. Mar. 15, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-102-JWD-RLB

03-15-2016

MICHAEL A. FOOTE v. ROBERT TANNER, ET AL.


OPINION

After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated February 26, 2016, to which no objection was filed:

IT IS ORDERED that the instant petition be considered, in part, as a motion for authorization to proceed with this successive habeas corpus application and that the instant petition is transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631, so that the Court of Appeals may determine whether to grant the petitioner authorization to file the instant habeas corpus petition in this Court.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on March 15, 2016.

/s/ _________

JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Foote v. Tanner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 15, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-102-JWD-RLB (M.D. La. Mar. 15, 2016)
Case details for

Foote v. Tanner

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL A. FOOTE v. ROBERT TANNER, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Mar 15, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-102-JWD-RLB (M.D. La. Mar. 15, 2016)