From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fonville v. Irving Poultry Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1934
243 App. Div. 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

December, 1934.


Appeal by plaintiff in a negligence action from order granting defendants' motion for a separate and prior trial of the issue raised by the defense of a general release. Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. When the settlement was made and the release was given by plaintiff for the comparatively small amount, the plaintiff and her physicians were unaware of the serious physical condition which subsequently developed, presumably as a result of the alleged injuries. Under such conditions, separate trials have not been granted. ( McGurty v. Delaware, L. W.R.R. Co., 172 App. Div. 46; Schoenbaum v. Reimer, 184 id. 944; Romania v. Lamport Holt, Ltd., 207 id. 861.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur. [See ante, p. 526.]


Summaries of

Fonville v. Irving Poultry Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1934
243 App. Div. 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Fonville v. Irving Poultry Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DORIS FONVILLE, an Infant, by FRANCES FONVILLE, Her Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1934

Citations

243 App. Div. 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Citing Cases

Spencer v. Hunt

The opinion in the McGurty case warns against the notion that an issue, concerning a release in a negligence…

Mosher v. Mitchell

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury and loss of services, in which the defendant…