From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fontrick Door, Inc. v. Ferguson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 30, 2012
10-CV-966A (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2012)

Opinion

10-CV-966A

01-30-2012

FONTRICK DOOR, INC., Plaintiff, v. JOHN FERGUSON and DML SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants..


ORDER

The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On January 10, 2012, Magistrate Judge Schroeder filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint be granted in part.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Schroeder's Report and Recommendation, defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint is granted in part.

The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Schroeder for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED.

______________

HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Fontrick Door, Inc. v. Ferguson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 30, 2012
10-CV-966A (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Fontrick Door, Inc. v. Ferguson

Case Details

Full title:FONTRICK DOOR, INC., Plaintiff, v. JOHN FERGUSON and DML SYSTEMS, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jan 30, 2012

Citations

10-CV-966A (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2012)