From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 26, 2001
798 So. 2d 951 (La. 2001)

Opinion

No. 01-C-0752.

October 26, 2001.

On Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Evangeline

Michael B. Miller, Esq., Counsel for Applicant.

Sammie M. Henry, Esq., Counsel for Respondent.


The judgment of the court of appeal is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, to render judgment anew after reconciling conflicting rulings in Fontenot v. Vidrine Water District, 00-762 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 2/21/01), 780 So.2d 1197 and Haynes v. Williams Fence and Aluminum, 01-0026 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 7/25/01) ___ So.2d ___, 2001 WL 832975, regarding the interpretation of La.R.S. 23:1201 (F).

We order the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, to decide this matter en banc in to achieve uniformity within the circuit.


Summaries of

Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 26, 2001
798 So. 2d 951 (La. 2001)
Case details for

Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. FONTENOT v. REDDELL VIDRINE WATER DISTRICT, ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Oct 26, 2001

Citations

798 So. 2d 951 (La. 2001)

Citing Cases

White v. Shop Rite

Subsequently, in Haynes, another panel of this court, faced with the same issue, adopted the dissenting…

HOFFMAN v. NOPD

We further order the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, to decide this matter en banc in order to achieve…