From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fontanella v. Fontanella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 13, 1990
167 A.D.2d 185 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 13, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Booth Glen, J.).


The court was within its discretion in conditioning the denial of plaintiff's motion to strike defendant's testimony upon defendant's payment of plaintiff's attorney's fees. (CPLR 3126.) Those fees were necessitated solely by defendant's failure to comply with the court's earlier order which required that she serve and file an affidavit of net worth by March 17, 1989. However, the court abused its discretion by arbitrarily fixing the amount of the fees, and we accordingly remand so that fees may be fixed upon a proper showing of the value of the work necessitated and amount of time actually expended.

Concur — Ross, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Fontanella v. Fontanella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 13, 1990
167 A.D.2d 185 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Fontanella v. Fontanella

Case Details

Full title:E. JOSEPH FONTANELLA, Respondent, v. DIANE FONTANELLA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 185 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
561 N.Y.S.2d 576

Citing Cases

Sage Realty Corp. v. Proskauer Rose LLP

The motion court was vested with broad power to accept or reject the Special Referee's report, including the…

Paull v. First Unum Life Insurance Company

In a prior order the court had awarded plaintiffs sanctions against defendant First UNUM Life Insurance…