From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Font v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jul 31, 2020
299 So. 3d 627 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5D19-3684

07-31-2020

Raul Jose FONT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and George D.E. Burden, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and, Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and George D.E. Burden, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and, Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Raul Font, was originally found guilty of lewd or lascivious battery in 2008 and placed on sex offender probation. He violated that probation, and community control was added to his sentence. He later violated the terms of his community control and probation. Rather than answer to those charges in 2010, he fled the jurisdiction, only to be arrested again in 2018. We affirm Appellant's conviction and resulting sentence for violation of probation. Although the court orally announced the basis for finding a violation of probation, there is no order of revocation identifying the conditions Appellant was found to have violated. We remand this matter for entry of an appropriate order. See Wamsley v. State , 293 So. 3d 1130 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE, and SASSO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Font v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jul 31, 2020
299 So. 3d 627 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Font v. State

Case Details

Full title:RAUL JOSE FONT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jul 31, 2020

Citations

299 So. 3d 627 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Citing Cases

Veltman v. State

Because the record does not include a written revocation order that identifies the terms and conditions of…

Marshall v. State

An order revoking probation must state in writing the conditions the trial court found a defendant to have…