From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fonseca v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2011
Case No.: CV 10-1996 DLB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: CV 10-1996 DLB

08-02-2011

OLGA FONSECA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Young Cho Attorney at Law: 189870 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing Attorneys for Plaintiff Olga Fonseca


Young Cho

Attorney at Law: 189870

Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Olga Fonseca

STIPULATION AND

ORDER FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)

TO THE HONORABLE DENNIS L. BECK, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Olga Fonseca be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of one thousand eight hundred dollars ($1,800.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d).

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Olga Fonseca, the government will consider the matter of Olga Fonseca's assignment of EAJA fees to Young Cho. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2252-2253 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Olga Fonseca, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Olga Fonseca does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, pursuant to the assignment executed by Olga Fonseca. Any payments made shall be delivered to Young Cho.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Olga Fonseca's request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Olga Fonseca and/or Young Cho including Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

Young Cho reserves the right to contend that any non-payment caused by the collection of a federal debt owed by Olga Fonseca violates 31 C.F.R. § 285.5(e)(5) and Morrison v. C.I.R., 565 F.3d 658, 667 (9th Cir. 2009). Nothing in this stipulation shall be construed as an admission by Young Cho that the Government has the right or authority to offset the fees due and payable pursuant to this stipulation.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Young Cho and/or Lawrence D. Rohlfing to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING

BY:Young Cho

Attorney for plaintiff Olga Fonseca

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

Kathryn R. Watson

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant Michael J. Astrue,

Commissioner of Social Security

(Per e-mail authorization)

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Fonseca v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2011
Case No.: CV 10-1996 DLB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Fonseca v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:OLGA FONSECA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 2, 2011

Citations

Case No.: CV 10-1996 DLB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)