Opinion
22-1520 22-1534
10-20-2022
KEVIN PETER FONSECA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN RED CROSS; GAIL MCGOVERN; ANGELA POWLEY; BRANDI MCLENDON; DANIELLE BOWEN; CHRISTI MATHEWSON; DELORIS WILBORN; AVIS BUTTS; DOES 1-25, Defendants-Appellees. KEVIN PETER FONSECA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. I.B.T. TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 71; ERNEST WRENN, Defendants-Appellees.
Kevin Peter Fonseca, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Ryan Adams, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Charlotte, North Carolina; Trisha Suzanne Pande, PATTERSON HARKAVY, LLP, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: October 18, 2022
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judges. (3:21-cv-00452-RJC-DSC; 3:21-cv-00369-MOC-DCK)
Kevin Peter Fonseca, Appellant Pro Se.
Joshua Ryan Adams, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Charlotte, North Carolina; Trisha Suzanne Pande, PATTERSON HARKAVY, LLP, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Kevin Peter Fonseca appeals the district court's orders dismissing his complaints that challenged the American Red Cross' decision to terminate his employment and the adequacy of his union's representation in the subsequent grievance proceedings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fonseca v. Am. Red Cross, No. 3:21-cv-00452-RJC-DSC (W.D. N.C. Apr. 19, 2022); Fonseca v. I.B.T. Teamsters Loc. Union 71, No. 3:21-cv-00369-MOC-DCK (W.D. N.C. May 9, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.