From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FONG v. OH

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Dec 19, 2007
172 P.3d 499 (Haw. 2007)

Opinion

No. 27635

December 19, 2007.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CIV. NO. 02-1-2007)


ORDER OF CORRECTION


IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opinion of the court filed on November 30, 2007 is hereby corrected as follows (deletions are in brackets and additions are double underscored):

Page 2, footnote 1 (delete comma): The Honorable Gary W.B. Chang[,] presided over this matter.

Page 3, footnotes: footnote numbered [1] is corrected to read footnote number 2 and all subsequent footnotes shall be renumbered accordingly.

Page 4, footnote 3, line 1: HRS § 245-3 (2001) provides that every wholesaler or dealer of cigarettes

Page 18, paragraph 2, line 4: meaning of . . . HRS § [481] 485-1 (12)." 52 Haw. at 643, 485 P.2d at

Page 19, line 5: (emphasis added) (capitalization altered), this court concluded that the contracts in

Page 21, line 6: instrument is both labeled "stock" and "possess[es] `some of the

Page 22, line 17 (add underscore): fits within [any] any of the examples listed in the statutory

Page 26, line 5: economic conditions in Hawai'i and the [long-reign]long reign of the Hawaii Page 28, line 11: Security Act, see supra note [12] 13, and (3) the remedial purposes of

Page 28, line 14: Securities Act," noted supra at note [15]16), there are convincing

Page 29, heading numbered 3, line 3: "security" under HRS § [425] 485-1(12)?

The Clerk of the Court is directed to incorporate the foregoing changes in the original opinion and take all necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of these changes.


Summaries of

FONG v. OH

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Dec 19, 2007
172 P.3d 499 (Haw. 2007)
Case details for

FONG v. OH

Case Details

Full title:CONNIE Y. FONG, Respondent/Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee v…

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: Dec 19, 2007

Citations

172 P.3d 499 (Haw. 2007)

Citing Cases

Andrews v. Browne

Although the "sale of business" doctrine is no longer applicable under the federal Acts, there continues to…