From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Folsom v. Barnett

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Nov 1, 1957
306 S.W.2d 832 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957)

Opinion

November 1, 1957.

Appeal from the Mercer Circuit Court, K.S. Alcorn, J.

James F. Clay, Danville, for appellant.

W. Earl Dean, Harrodsburg, for appellee.


Robert H. Folsom, defendant below, has moved for an appeal from a judgment of the Mercer Circuit Court by which appellee was awarded damages in the sum of $500 for injury to a thoroughbred colt which resulted in its destruction. The injury was alleged to have resulted from malpractice on the part of appellant, a veterinarian.

An examination of the record has revealed that sufficient evidence was produced to put in issue the question of whether appellant used such skill and attention as may ordinarily be expected of careful and skillful persons in his profession.

The issue was correctly submitted to a jury.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment stands affirmed.


Summaries of

Folsom v. Barnett

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Nov 1, 1957
306 S.W.2d 832 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957)
Case details for

Folsom v. Barnett

Case Details

Full title:Robert H. FOLSOM, Appellant, v. Mary Louise BARNETT, an Infant Suing by…

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Nov 1, 1957

Citations

306 S.W.2d 832 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957)

Citing Cases

Loman v. Freeman

s under the common law. Turner v. Sinha, 65 Ohio App. 3d 30, 35, 582 N.E.2d 1018, 1021 (1989); Berres v.…