From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Follette v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 27, 1936
94 S.W.2d 454 (Tex. Crim. App. 1936)

Opinion

No. 18136.

Delivered April 8, 1936. Rehearing Denied May 27, 1936.

1. — Appeal.

Where record before Court of Criminal Appeals was without statement of facts or bills of exception, and all matters of procedure appeared regular, judgment was affirmed.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

2. — Appeal — Statement of Facts.

Where no affidavit made by accused stating his inability to pay for statement of facts was before the Court of Criminal Appeals, and record did not show affidavit was filed and called to attention of trial court, accused held not entitled to have statement of facts free of charge for purpose of appeal.

Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Jefferson County. Tried before before the Hon. Robt. A. Shivers, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for robbery; penalty, confinement in penitentiary for five years.

Affirmed.

The opinion states the case.

R. G. Robertson, of Port Arthur, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


Conviction for robbery; punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

The record is here without any statement of facts or bills of exception. All matters of procedure appear regular.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

MORROW, P. J., absent.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.


The motion for rehearing is based upon the averment that the appellant, through his attorney, prepared a statement of facts which was exhibited to the county attorney, who refused to agree to it; that after the disagreement appellant filed an affidavit stating his inability to pay for a statement of facts. However, the alleged affidavit is not before this court. The right to a statement of facts under the provisions of Art. 760, sub. 6, C. C. P., is conditioned upon compliance with the statute. Among the essential provisions is that which prescribes that the affidavit must be made by the accused. It is also necessary that the record show that the affidavit was filed and called to the attention of the trial court. The article in question is discussed in Texas Jur., Vol. 4, p. 415, sec. 283.

We find nothing in the record which would authorize a reversal of the conviction.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

Overruled.


Summaries of

Follette v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 27, 1936
94 S.W.2d 454 (Tex. Crim. App. 1936)
Case details for

Follette v. State

Case Details

Full title:MELVILLE FOLLETTE v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: May 27, 1936

Citations

94 S.W.2d 454 (Tex. Crim. App. 1936)
94 S.W.2d 454