From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FOLLENDER v. MERL

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 650 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

June, 1934.


Judgment and order reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. While plaintiff's arrest was illegal, the appellants were not responsible for it. ( Vittorio v. St. Regis Paper Co., 239 N.Y. 148.) While the issuance of the warrant was sufficient to form a basis for the action for malicious prosecution ( Halberstadt v. New York Life Ins. Co., 194 N.Y. 1), it clearly appears from the evidence that the criminal proceeding was terminated by agreement of the parties prior to the commencement of this action, and for this reason the action for malicious prosecution will not lie. Young, Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

FOLLENDER v. MERL

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 650 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

FOLLENDER v. MERL

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED L. FOLLENDER, Respondent, v. HYMAN MERL and Another, Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1934

Citations

242 App. Div. 650 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Citing Cases

Petersen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

In an action for malicious prosecution, order denying motion of plaintiff Fred Douglas to strike out a…

Kabnick v. O'Malley

While plaintiff alleged that he was coerced into signing the releases, that conclusory statement is…