From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Folk v. Peters

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 11, 2024
3:24-cv-117-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 11, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-cv-117-KAP

12-11-2024

OMAR S. FOLK, Plaintiff v. COLETTE PETERS, Director, Bureau of Prisons, et al., Defendants


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Keith A. Pesto, United States Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff has filed two motions listed as pending, a “motion for status update,” ECF no. 9, and a “motion to file preliminary injunctive relief,” ECF no. 11. The former asks for the status of plaintiff's appeal of my denial of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The appeal is pending. The latter asks for a variety of things and was taken by the Clerk to be a motion for preliminary injunction. Because no complaint is pending, to the extent ECF no. 11 is intended as a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 65 it is denied without prejudice to being considered if plaintiff pays the filing fee or is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

The Clerk can terminate ECF no. 9 as granted herein and ECF no. 11 as denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Folk v. Peters

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 11, 2024
3:24-cv-117-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 11, 2024)
Case details for

Folk v. Peters

Case Details

Full title:OMAR S. FOLK, Plaintiff v. COLETTE PETERS, Director, Bureau of Prisons, et…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 11, 2024

Citations

3:24-cv-117-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 11, 2024)