From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foley v. Ulrich

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 4, 1967
50 N.J. 426 (N.J. 1967)

Summary

reversing and adopting the Appellate Division dissent

Summary of this case from Luchejko v. the City of Hoboken

Opinion

Argued November 21, 1967 —

Decided December 4, 1967.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Samuel A. Gennet for appellants ( Mr. Aram R. Schefrin on the brief).

Mr. Myron W. Kronisch for respondent ( Messrs. Roskein, Kronisch Felzenberg, attorneys).


The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Kolovsky in the Appellate Division.

For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices FRANCIS, PROCTOR, GOLDMANN, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For affirmance — None.


Summaries of

Foley v. Ulrich

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 4, 1967
50 N.J. 426 (N.J. 1967)

reversing and adopting the Appellate Division dissent

Summary of this case from Luchejko v. the City of Hoboken

reversing and adopting the Appellate Division dissent by Judge Kolovsky

Summary of this case from Nunez v. Gallo
Case details for

Foley v. Ulrich

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET FOLEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM W. ULRICH AND LOIS…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Dec 4, 1967

Citations

50 N.J. 426 (N.J. 1967)
236 A.2d 137

Citing Cases

Nunez v. Gallo

The trial court determined, as a matter of law, that defendants had no duty to plaintiff because Louis…

Perez v. Bator

Hence, we consider the substance of those expert reports in the course of our own analysis. In moving for…