From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 1, 2006
937 So. 2d 235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Summary

affirming denial of rule 3.800 motion

Summary of this case from Foley v. State

Opinion

No. 3D06-1641.

September 1, 2006.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Leonard E. Glick, Judge.

Arthur W. Foley, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and SUAREZ, JJ.


The appellant claims the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the State did not file an amended information after orally amending the information. We affirm the trial court's denial of the 3.800 motion. See State v. Anderson, 537 So.2d 1373 (Fla. 1989).


Summaries of

Foley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 1, 2006
937 So. 2d 235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

affirming denial of rule 3.800 motion

Summary of this case from Foley v. State
Case details for

Foley v. State

Case Details

Full title:Arthur W. FOLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 1, 2006

Citations

937 So. 2d 235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Foley v. State

This Court has also disposed of other matters adversely to Foley. Foley v. State, 937 So.2d 235 (Fla. 3d DCA…