From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foley v. Shanahan

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 7, 1974
211 S.E.2d 367 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)

Opinion

49852, 50036.

SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 4, 1974.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 7, 1974.

Appellate procedure. DeKalb Superior Court. Before Judge Norvell.

Wm. Lewis Spearman, for appellants.

Arnall, Golden Gregory, Elliott H. Levitas, Thomas R. Todd, Jr., for appellees.


1. Piece-meal review is not favored by the courts. "[I]n the absence of an express determination by the court that there is no just reason for delay and an express direction for entry of judgment, no order or decision which adjudicates with respect to fewer than all the claims or all the parties is final or appealable. [Code Ann. § 81A-154 and cits.].

"Since there is no appeal from a final, appealable judgment in the record and no certificate for immediate review as provided for by Code Ann. § 6-701 (a, 2) this appeal must be dismissed under authority of the above cases." Rodriguez v. Newby, 130 Ga. App. 139, 140 ( 202 S.E.2d 565).

2. In view of the dismissal of the main appeal, it is unnecessary to consider the cross appeal.

Appeals dismissed. Bell, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 4, 1974 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 7, 1974.


Summaries of

Foley v. Shanahan

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 7, 1974
211 S.E.2d 367 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)
Case details for

Foley v. Shanahan

Case Details

Full title:FOLEY et al. v. SHANAHAN et al.; and vice versa

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Nov 7, 1974

Citations

211 S.E.2d 367 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)
133 Ga. App. 262

Citing Cases

Travelers Indemnity Company of R.I. v. Schenden

The courts do not favor piece-meal review. Foley v. Shanahan, 133 Ga. App. 262 (1) ( 211 S.E.2d 367). "Where…

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Noble

Where this court elects to so intercede, then complete justice must be done. "Piece-meal review is not…