From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FOLEY v. FORTY-SECOND ST. ST. NICHOLAS AVE

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Feb 1, 1906
49 Misc. 649 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)

Opinion

February, 1906.

Wilcox Green, for appellant.

William E. Weaver, for respondent.


Plaintiff and his witnesses testify that his automobile, while running up Broadway, parallel with, near to, but not on defendant's track, was struck from behind by one of defendant's cars, going in the same direction as the machine.

On a motion to dismiss, inferences most favorable to plaintiff's case must be drawn, and it cannot be said from the facts developed that there was not evidence of defendant's negligence in failing to observe the automobile which was running ahead of it, for some distance, so near the track as to make a collision inevitable if the car attempted to pass it.

If plaintiff's testimony be true, it was not negligence on his part to fail to look behind for approaching cars.

Present: SCOTT, GIEGERICH and GREENBAUM, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.


Summaries of

FOLEY v. FORTY-SECOND ST. ST. NICHOLAS AVE

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Feb 1, 1906
49 Misc. 649 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)
Case details for

FOLEY v. FORTY-SECOND ST. ST. NICHOLAS AVE

Case Details

Full title:JOHN FOLEY, Jr., Appellant, v . THE FORTY-SECOND STREET, ST. NICHOLAS AVE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Feb 1, 1906

Citations

49 Misc. 649 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)
97 N.Y.S. 958