Fohrmeister v. Doe

Full title: ROBERT C. FOHRMEISTER, pro se, Plaintiff, v. JANE DOE, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Aug 15, 2011

Case No: 8:11-CV-1227-T-30MAP (M.D. Fla. Aug. 15, 2011)

Opinion

Case No: 8:11-CV-1227-T-30MAP.

August 15, 2011

ORDER

JAMES MOODY JR., District Judge

THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon the Report and Recommendation submitted by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo (Dkt. #6). The Court notes that neither party filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time for filing such objections has elapsed.

After careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation should be adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects.

ACCORDINGLY, it is therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #6) of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all purposes, including appellate review.

2. Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. #5) is DENIED.

3. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Dkt. #4) is dismissed.

4. The Clerk is directed to close this file.

DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida.