From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fogle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 12, 2000
754 So. 2d 878 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Summary

holding that a defendant could not be convicted of two counts of resisting an officer without violence “where his altercation with a number of officers was in the course of his continuous resistance to an ongoing attempt to effect his arrest.”

Summary of this case from R.J.R. v. State

Opinion

No. 1D99-2238.

Opinion filed April 12, 2000.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County, George H. Pierce, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; and Richard M. Summa, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; and Trisha E. Meggs, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Appellant appeals his conviction and sentence on six grounds, only one of which merits discussion. Appellant was convicted on, among other charges, two counts of resisting arrest without violence. We find Appellant's two convictions of resisting arrest without violence constitute a double-jeopardy violation and, accordingly, reverse.

After Appellant was told he was under arrest, he struck a police officer, ran away, fell, and when four officers caught him, continued to resist. Although a defendant may commit more than one offense in an altercation with police officers, he can be convicted of only one count of resisting arrest where his altercation with a number of officers was in the course of his continuous resistance to an ongoing attempt to effect his arrest.Wallace v. State, 724 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 1998); Jones v. State, 711 So.2d 633 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Multiple convictions on multiple counts of resisting arrest without violence arising out of a single episode, even if more than one officer is involved, constitute a double-jeopardy violation. Wallace, supra; Jones,supra.

Because Appellant's two convictions arose from a single episode, we REVERSE and REMAND for the trial court to vacate one of the convictions for resisting arrest without violence. Jones,supra; Pierce v. State, 681 So.2d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996),approved, 724 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 1998). If the reversal alters the presumptive guidelines sentencing range, Appellant should be resentenced under a corrected guidelines scoresheet. Pierce,supra. Appellant's convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED on all other grounds.

MINER and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Fogle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 12, 2000
754 So. 2d 878 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

holding that a defendant could not be convicted of two counts of resisting an officer without violence “where his altercation with a number of officers was in the course of his continuous resistance to an ongoing attempt to effect his arrest.”

Summary of this case from R.J.R. v. State

holding that a defendant could not be convicted of two counts of resisting an officer without violence "where his altercation with a number of officers was in the course of his continuous resistance to an ongoing attempt to effect his arrest."

Summary of this case from R.J.R. v. State

holding that a defendant who, after being told he was under arrest, struck an officer, fled, and then struck additional officers after he was caught could not be convicted of both resisting with violence and resisting without violence since his actions arose out of a single continuous effort to avoid arrest

Summary of this case from Williams v. State
Case details for

Fogle v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRANK FOGLE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 12, 2000

Citations

754 So. 2d 878 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

City of Wichita v. Cook

The problem is, the City asserted separate charges against Cook for resisting each officer in the same…

Williams v. State

Moreover, a defendant's flight from officers does not, by itself, transform a single continuous resistance…