From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fogle v. Pierson

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 5, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-cv-01211-PSF-CBS (D. Colo. Jul. 5, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-cv-01211-PSF-CBS.

July 5, 2006


ORDER


This civil action comes before the court on Fogle's "Motion to Strike Defendants['] Motion of (Combined Answer of Defendants) [sic]" (filed June 23, 2006) (doc. # 39). Pursuant to the Order of Reference dated April 17, 2006 (doc. # 26) and the memorandum dated July 3, 2006 (doc. # 41), this matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge. The court having reviewed Fogle's motion, the entire case file, and the applicable law and being sufficiently advised in the premises,

IT IS ORDERED that Fogle's "Motion to Strike Defendants['] Motion of (Combined Answer of Defendants) [sic]" (filed June 23, 2006) (doc. # 39) is DENIED as unnecessary. Defendants' Combined Answer and Motions to Dismiss (docs. # 34, # 35, and # 36) shall remain on file pending determination of Fogle's petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. As stated in the court's Minute Order dated June 19, 2006 (doc. # 38), Fogle's responses to Defendant Ortiz' Motion to Dismiss (doc. # 35) and Defendants' Combined Motion to Dismiss in Part (doc. # 36) shall be filed within thirty (30) days after a ruling on the petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court.


Summaries of

Fogle v. Pierson

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 5, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-cv-01211-PSF-CBS (D. Colo. Jul. 5, 2006)
Case details for

Fogle v. Pierson

Case Details

Full title:RONALD JENNINGS FOGLE, Plaintiff, v. CAPTAIN PIERSON, C.D.O.C., Committee…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jul 5, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-cv-01211-PSF-CBS (D. Colo. Jul. 5, 2006)