Opinion
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03253-CMA-MEH
05-10-2012
DARLENE GAYNEL FOGLE, and RONALD JENNINGS FOGLE, Plaintiffs, v. ARCHER THOMAS ELLIOTT, JR., sued in his individual capacity, Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on May 10, 2012.
Plaintiff's (sic) Amended Motion for Summary Judgment [filed May 8, 2012; docket #54] is denied without prejudice and stricken for failure to comply with Judge Arguello's Practice Standards. Like Plaintiffs' first motion for summary judgment [docket #46], the vast majority of "undisputed facts" set forth in the Amended Motion are not accompanied by citations to the record. In addition, many of the "undisputed facts" are actually legal arguments that should be raised in a separate section of the brief. See CMA Civ. Prac. Stds. § III.G.8 ("Legal argument is not permitted [in the "Statement of Undisputed Material Facts"] and should be reserved for separate portions of the briefs."). Plaintiffs are encouraged to carefully consult Judge Arguello's Practice Standards and the Local Rules before filing further motions with the Court.