From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fogle v. Elliott

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 1, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03253-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Nov. 1, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03253-CMA-MEH

11-01-2012

DARLENE GAYNEL FOGLE, and RONALD JENNINGS FOGLE, Plaintiffs, v. ARCHER THOMAS ELLIOTT, JR., in his individual capacity, Defendant.


FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.

Pursuant to the Order Adopting in Part the September 18, 2012 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, entered on October 31, 2012 by Judge Christine M. Arguello, it is

ORDERED that Defendant's Renewed Motion to Dismiss and to Strike (Doc. # 72) be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as specified in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 1st day of November, 2012.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: ____________

Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Fogle v. Elliott

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 1, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03253-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Nov. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Fogle v. Elliott

Case Details

Full title:DARLENE GAYNEL FOGLE, and RONALD JENNINGS FOGLE, Plaintiffs, v. ARCHER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 1, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03253-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Nov. 1, 2012)