From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fogle v. Elliott

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 2, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03253-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 2, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03253-CMA-MEH

04-02-2012

DARLENE GAYNEL FOGLE, and RONALD JENNINGS FOGLE, Plaintiffs, v. ARCHER THOMAS ELLIOTT, JR., sued in his individual capacity, Defendant.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on April 2, 2012.

Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and to Strike [filed March 20, 2012; docket #23]. Plaintiffs filed a response to the motion on March 28, 2012, noting that Defendant's Motion is premature in light of the Court's March 21, 2012 Order granting Plaintiffs an additional 90 days within which to file a Certificate of Review. (See dockets ##25, 34.) Because Defendant's Motion is premised, in part, on Plaintiffs' failure to file a Certificate of Review, Defendant's Motion is denied without prejudice as premature. Defendant may re-file the Motion upon the expiration of the 90-day period authorized by the Court. Defendant's renewed Motion shall comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 10.1E and all other federal and local rules.


Summaries of

Fogle v. Elliott

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 2, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03253-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Fogle v. Elliott

Case Details

Full title:DARLENE GAYNEL FOGLE, and RONALD JENNINGS FOGLE, Plaintiffs, v. ARCHER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 2, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03253-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 2, 2012)