From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foertsch v. Foertsch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 23, 1992
187 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

November 23, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Corrado, J.).


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

No appeal lies from an order made upon reargument which adheres to the determination in an order denying a motion to resettle the decretal paragraphs of a judgment (see, Zagami v Zagami, 173 A.D.2d 698; Schanback v Schanback, 159 A.D.2d 498; Stockfield v Stockfield, 131 A.D.2d 834; Blume v Blume, 124 A.D.2d 771). Lawrence, J.P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Foertsch v. Foertsch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 23, 1992
187 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Foertsch v. Foertsch

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA FOERTSCH, Respondent, v. FRANK FOERTSCH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 23, 1992

Citations

187 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
590 N.Y.S.2d 238

Citing Cases

Malafi v. A 2000 Volkswagen, Vin No. WVWMA23B3YP226270

A default in pleading by a defendant in a civil proceeding, however, does not automatically qualify a…

Cohen v. 1999 Pontiac

A default in pleading by a defendant in a civil proceeding, however, does not automatically qualify a…