From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fodor v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 17, 2011
Case No.: 3.10-cv-798-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 3.10-cv-798-RCJ-VPC

10-17-2011

THOMAS F. ("TIM") FODOR, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE, a fictitious Defendant a.k.a. TAZMANIAN 353 a.k.a. TAZ whose identity is not verified; PHILLIP MAURICE HICKS a.k.a. MARTY HICKS a.k.a. TAZMANILAN353 a.k.a. TAZ, et al. Defendants.

RICHARD G. HILL, ESQ. State Bar No. 596 CASEY D. BAKER, ESQ. State Bar No. 9504 RICHARD G. HILL, CHARTERED Attorney for Plaintiff


RICHARD G. HILL, ESQ.

State Bar No. 596

CASEY D. BAKER, ESQ.

State Bar No. 9504

RICHARD G. HILL, CHARTERED

Attorney for Plaintiff

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, THOMAS F. FODOR, by and through his counsel, RICHARD G. HILL, ESQ., and RICHARD G. HILL, CHARTERED, voluntarily dismisses this case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(i). No defendant has filed an answer or motion for summary judgment in this case.

AFFIRMATION Pursuant to NRS 239B.030

The undersigned does hereby affirm that the preceding document does not contain the social security number of any person.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ROBERT C. JONES


Summaries of

Fodor v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 17, 2011
Case No.: 3.10-cv-798-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Fodor v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS F. ("TIM") FODOR, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE, a fictitious…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 3.10-cv-798-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Oct. 17, 2011)