Opinion
CASE NO. CV 11-08496 MMM (RZx)
12-31-2012
JS-6
JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS
On June 15, 2012, the court granted defendants' motion to dismiss the first and second causes of action asserted in plaintiff's first amended complaint with prejudice, granting leave to amend plaintiffs' remaining claims. On December 31, 2012, the court granted defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs' federal securities fraud claim with prejudice. The court dismissed the remaining state law claims asserted by plaintiff without prejudice. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that
1. That plaintiffs' claims for violation of the Investment Adviser Act, 15 U.S.C. § 80-b, et seq; violation of section 11 of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77a; and violation of 15 U.S.C. § 78j and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 be dismissed with prejudice; and
3. That the remainder of plaintiffs' claims be dismissed without prejudice.
______________
MARGARET M. MORROW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE