From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fodor v. Blakey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 31, 2012
CASE NO. CV 11-08496 MMM (RZx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 31, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 11-08496 MMM (RZx)

12-31-2012

PETER FODOR; BARBARA FODOR and CHANEL AIR LLC, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL IAN BLAKEY; MICHAEL BLAKEY INC., THE MICHAEL BLAKELEY REVOCABLE TRUST; MICHAEL Blakey TRUST; THE BLAKE REVOCABLE TRUST; BLAKE TRUST; STUART A. GOLDSMITH; EUROTECH WHEELS, LLC; PYLON INTERNATIONAL, INC.; DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants


JS-6


JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS

On June 15, 2012, the court granted defendants' motion to dismiss the first and second causes of action asserted in plaintiff's first amended complaint with prejudice, granting leave to amend plaintiffs' remaining claims. On December 31, 2012, the court granted defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs' federal securities fraud claim with prejudice. The court dismissed the remaining state law claims asserted by plaintiff without prejudice. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that

1. That plaintiffs' claims for violation of the Investment Adviser Act, 15 U.S.C. § 80-b, et seq; violation of section 11 of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77a; and violation of 15 U.S.C. § 78j and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 be dismissed with prejudice; and
3. That the remainder of plaintiffs' claims be dismissed without prejudice.

______________

MARGARET M. MORROW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Fodor v. Blakey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 31, 2012
CASE NO. CV 11-08496 MMM (RZx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Fodor v. Blakey

Case Details

Full title:PETER FODOR; BARBARA FODOR and CHANEL AIR LLC, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL IAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 31, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. CV 11-08496 MMM (RZx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 31, 2012)

Citing Cases

Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am., Corp. v. Mountain Movers Eng'g Co.

Courts have relied on Rule 12(f) to strike pleadings that include inadmissible or privileged information.…

Phx. Ins. Co. v. Diamond Plastics Corp.

"Courts utilize Rule 12(f) to strike sections of a pleading that include inadmissible or privileged…