From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foam Holdings Inc. v. Creative Foam Prods.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 26, 2024
4:23-cv-00320-KGB (E.D. Ark. Dec. 26, 2024)

Opinion

4:23-cv-00320-KGB

12-26-2024

FOAM HOLDINGS, INC. d/b/a Alleguard PLAINTIFF v. CREATIVE FOAM PRODUCTS, LLC, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

Kristine G. Baker Chief United States District Judge

Before the Court is the motion for leave to file reply of defendants Creative Foam Products, LLC and Charles Tyner (Dkt. No. 89). Defendants state that a reply to plaintiff Foam Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Alleguard's response is necessary to address allegedly misleading statements and arguments raised by plaintiff's response in opposition to their motion to strike and to compel discovery (Id., ¶ 2). For good cause shown, the Court grants defendants' motion for leave to file reply (Dkt. No. 89). Defendants shall file their reply in support of their motion to strike and to compel discovery within 14 days of the date of this Order.

It is so ordered


Summaries of

Foam Holdings Inc. v. Creative Foam Prods.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 26, 2024
4:23-cv-00320-KGB (E.D. Ark. Dec. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Foam Holdings Inc. v. Creative Foam Prods.

Case Details

Full title:FOAM HOLDINGS, INC. d/b/a Alleguard PLAINTIFF v. CREATIVE FOAM PRODUCTS…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 26, 2024

Citations

4:23-cv-00320-KGB (E.D. Ark. Dec. 26, 2024)