From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flynn v. Flynn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 1986
124 A.D.2d 699 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

November 17, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Special Term properly denied the defendant's motion to vacate the order entered October 13, 1982. That order was superseded by the judgment of divorce (see, Schapiro v Schapiro, 27 A.D.2d 667) and was of no effect after entry of the judgment (see, Mittman v Mittman, 263 App. Div. 384; Kellogg v Stoddard, 89 App. Div. 137). His further argument that the failure to comply with what he claims to have been an invalid pendente lite order had a prejudicial impact on the trial court's custody determination provides no basis for vacating the pendente lite order. Such an argument might have been cognizable on direct appeal from the judgment. However, by order dated January 24, 1986, the defendant's appeal from the judgment was dismissed for failure to perfect the same. Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Flynn v. Flynn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 1986
124 A.D.2d 699 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Flynn v. Flynn

Case Details

Full title:MARY A.C. FLYNN, Respondent, v. DANIEL M. FLYNN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 17, 1986

Citations

124 A.D.2d 699 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

In re Mary Cucinello

While it is true that "`custody determinations should be made only after a full and fair hearing * * * at…

Flynn v. Flynn

Such an argument might have been cognizable on direct appeal from the judgment. However, by order dated…