From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flynn v. Connecticut Stone Erectors, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Aug 14, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-1014 (ESH) (D.D.C. Aug. 14, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-1014 (ESH).

August 14, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before the Court is plaintiffs' motion for entry of default judgment. This case is an action for legal and equitable relief under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980, 29 U.S.C. § 1145. Defendant was served with the complaint on July 1, 2009, but has failed to answer or otherwise defend this action. The Clerk of Court entered default on July 24, 2009. Pursuant to the Court's July 27, 2009 Order directing plaintiffs to move for entry of judgment, plaintiffs have moved for entry of default judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(2).

The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(1), and venue is proper under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(2). The Court has jurisdiction over defendant pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(2) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(k)(1)(C).

The determination of whether default judgment is appropriate is committed to the discretion of the trial court. Jackson v. Beech, 636 F.2d 831, 836 (D.C. Cir. 1980). For default judgment, defendant must be considered a "totally unresponsive" party and its default plainly willful, reflected by its failure to respond to the summons and complaint, the entry of default, or the motion for default judgment. Gutierrez v. Berg Contracting Inc., No. 99-3044, 2000 WL 331721, *1 (D.D.C. March 20, 2000) (citing Jackson, 636 F.2d at 836). Given "the absence of any request to set aside the default or suggestion by the defendant that it has a meritorious defense," it is clear that the standard for default judgment has been satisfied. Id.

Although the default establishes a defendant's liability, the Court makes an independent determination of the sum to be awarded in the judgment unless the amount of damages is certain. Adkins v. Teseo, 180 F. Supp. 2d 15, 17 (D.D.C. 2001). Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2), the Court shall award plaintiffs: (A) the unpaid contributions; (B) interest on the unpaid contributions; (C) liquidated damages in an amount equal to the greater of (i) interest on the unpaid contributions, or (ii) 20 percent (or such higher percentage as may be permitted under Federal or State law) of the amount determined by the court under subparagraph (A); (D) reasonable attorney's fees and costs of the action, to be paid by the defendant; and (E) such other legal or equitable relief as the court deems appropriate. The Court may rely on detailed affidavits or documentary evidence to determine the appropriate sum for default judgment. Flynn v. Mastro Masonry Contractors, 237 F. Supp. 2d 66, 69 (D.D.C. 2002).

Plaintiffs have filed the declarations of David F. Stupar, Executive Director of the Bricklayers Trowel Trades International Pension Fund ("the Fund"), and Ira R. Mitzner, Esq., in support of the motion for default judgment. Based on the declarations, the Court finds that plaintiffs have established damages in the amount of $172,850.59 in unpaid contributions to the Fund for work performed during the period February 2007 through September 2008, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2)(A); $37,372.85 in interest on those unpaid contributions, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2)(B); and $34,570.33 for liquidated damages assessed on unpaid contributions, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2)(C)(ii). In addition, plaintiffs are entitled to attorney's fees in the amount of $3,489.00 and costs in the amount of $656.85, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2)(D).

Therefore, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2), judgment will be entered for plaintiffs in the amount of $248,939.62. A separate Order of judgment will accompany this opinion.


Summaries of

Flynn v. Connecticut Stone Erectors, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Aug 14, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-1014 (ESH) (D.D.C. Aug. 14, 2009)
Case details for

Flynn v. Connecticut Stone Erectors, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN FLYNN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CONNECTICUT STONE ERECTORS, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Aug 14, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-1014 (ESH) (D.D.C. Aug. 14, 2009)