From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fluoro Electric Corp. v. Smith Transport Ltd.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 9, 1960
160 A.2d 627 (N.J. 1960)

Opinion

Argued April 25, 1960 —

Decided May 9, 1960.

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Jerome S. Lieb argued the cause for the defendant-appellant ( Messrs. Harkavy Lieb, attorneys).

Mr. Arthur Slavitt argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent.


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Conford in the court below.

BURLING, J., concurring in result.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Fluoro Electric Corp. v. Smith Transport Ltd.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 9, 1960
160 A.2d 627 (N.J. 1960)
Case details for

Fluoro Electric Corp. v. Smith Transport Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:FLUORO ELECTRIC CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SMITH TRANSPORT…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 9, 1960

Citations

160 A.2d 627 (N.J. 1960)
160 A.2d 627

Citing Cases

Trezza v. Lambert-Wooley

"The court rules afford flexibility in amending pretrial orders 'where necessary to subserve the presentation…

Slim v. Slim

"That 'broad power of amendment should be liberally exercised at any stage of the proceedings,'" including…