Summary
declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over [plaintiff's] remaining state law claim after dismissing federal claims under the PLRA
Summary of this case from Meyers v. Cnty. of SacramentoOpinion
No. 2:14-cv-01775-SB
08-25-2015
WILLIAM PATRICK FLOYD, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER WATKINS, in individual and official capacities, Defendant.
ORDER :
Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation [30] on July 16, 2015, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [24]. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings & Recommendation [30], and therefore, grants Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [24].
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 25 day of August, 2015.
/s/_________
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge