From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Floyd v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Feb 6, 2015
108 A.3d 1224 (Del. 2015)

Opinion

No. 622 2014.

2015-02-6

Larry D. FLOYD, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.


Court Below—Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for Sussex County, Cr. ID No. 88S00074DI.

ORDER


RANDY J. HOLLAND, Justice.

This 6th day of February 2015, it appears to the Court that:

(1) On November 5, 2014, the appellant, Larry D. Floyd, filed a notice of appeal from a Superior Court order dated October 30, 2014, denying his motion for correction of illegal sentence. Floyd's opening brief and appendix were due on or before December 22, 2014.

(2) On December 23, 2014, the Chief Deputy Clerk sent a notice of brief delinquency to the address provided by Floyd. On December 31, 2014, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice to show cause, by certified mail, directing Floyd to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to file the opening brief and appendix. The notice to show cause was sent again, by first class mail, on January 12, 2015.

(3) Floyd has failed to respond to the notices to show cause and still has not filed an opening brief. Under these circumstances, dismissal of the appeal is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.?


Summaries of

Floyd v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Feb 6, 2015
108 A.3d 1224 (Del. 2015)
Case details for

Floyd v. State

Case Details

Full title:Larry D. FLOYD, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.

Date published: Feb 6, 2015

Citations

108 A.3d 1224 (Del. 2015)