From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Floyd v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jul 2, 2021
320 So. 3d 1011 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

No. 1D20-2296

07-02-2021

Carlo Eugene FLOYD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Carlo Eugene Floyd, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Carlo Eugene Floyd, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam. The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

B.L. Thomas, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Floyd v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jul 2, 2021
320 So. 3d 1011 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Floyd v. State

Case Details

Full title:Carlo Eugene FLOYD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Jul 2, 2021

Citations

320 So. 3d 1011 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)