Defendant's testimony to which plaintiff objected added little, if anything, to evidence received without objection and was therefore not prejudicial to plaintiff. See Crawford v. Emerson Constr. Co., 222 Iowa 378, 389, 269 N.W. 334; Independent School District v. Sass, 220 Iowa 1, 4, 5, 261 N.W. 30; Silvers v. Floyd, 151 Iowa 415, 417, 131 N.W. 652. [10] VII.
[6] The situation is not unlike that where we have held harmless error results by the admission of improper evidence where the fact thereby sought to be shown is otherwise fully shown by an abundance of testimony. Silvers v. Floyd, 151 Iowa 415, 131 N.W. 652; Kirkwood v. Perry Town Lot Improvement Co., 178 Iowa 248, 159 N.W. 774. [7] III. Defendants contend that plaintiff failed to establish damages in that the evidence does not establish that over 50 poults died of pullorum (of the 1673 poults that the evidence shows, died).
Appellant therefore suffered no prejudice by the admission of the catalogues. Independent Sch. Dist. v. Sass, 220 Iowa 1, 5, 261 N.W. 30; Powers v. Iowa Cent. Ry. Co., 157 Iowa 347, 349, 136 N.W. 1049; Silvers v. Floyd, 151 Iowa 415, 417, 131 N.W. 652. [7] The court also received in evidence a written agreement between appellee and wife and one Brennecke, dated July 27, 1940, listing the farm in question for sale with Brennecke, until August 15, 1940, at $155 an acre and agreeing to pay a commission of 2 per cent. Appellant objected to the offer as incompetent, irrelevant, immaterial, and self-serving.