From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FLOYD v. PEEL

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Feb 2, 2006
Case No.: 5:05cv96/SPM/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 2, 2006)

Opinion

Case No.: 5:05cv96/SPM/EMT.

February 2, 2006


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff commenced this action by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1). On November 30, 2005, this court entered an order (Doc. 16) giving Plaintiff thirty (30) days in which to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff failed to respond to the order, therefore, on January 10, 2006, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause, within twenty (20) days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court (Doc. 17). The time for compliance with the show cause order has now elapsed with no response from Plaintiff.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the court.


Summaries of

FLOYD v. PEEL

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Feb 2, 2006
Case No.: 5:05cv96/SPM/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 2, 2006)
Case details for

FLOYD v. PEEL

Case Details

Full title:KEITHAN MAR'YET FLOYD, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL PEEL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division

Date published: Feb 2, 2006

Citations

Case No.: 5:05cv96/SPM/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 2, 2006)