From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Floyd v. Nines

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 24, 2023
No. 23-6317 (4th Cir. Oct. 24, 2023)

Opinion

23-6317

10-24-2023

NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN JEFFREY NINES; RONALD STOTLER, Chief of Security; MS SHARON, Defendants - Appellees.

Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: October 19, 2023

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Julie R. Rubin, District Judge. (1:23-cv-00244-JRR)

Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr., appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. Floyd v. Nines, No. 1:23-cv-00244-JRR (D. Md. Mar. 20, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Floyd v. Nines

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 24, 2023
No. 23-6317 (4th Cir. Oct. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Floyd v. Nines

Case Details

Full title:NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN JEFFREY NINES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 24, 2023

Citations

No. 23-6317 (4th Cir. Oct. 24, 2023)