From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Floyd v. Grannis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 28, 2012
No. CIV S-08-2346 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-2346 WBS CKD P

03-28-2012

ANDRE RENE FLOYD, Plaintiff, v. N. GRANNIS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On December 2, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 2, 2011, are adopted in full;

2. Defendant Hasadri's November 5, 2010 motion for summary judgment is granted; and

3. Defendant Hasadri is dismissed from this action.

_________________________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Floyd v. Grannis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 28, 2012
No. CIV S-08-2346 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Floyd v. Grannis

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE RENE FLOYD, Plaintiff, v. N. GRANNIS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 28, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-08-2346 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2012)