From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Floyd v. Floyd

Supreme Court of Nevada.
May 10, 2012
381 P.3d 612 (Nev. 2012)

Opinion

No. 56898.

05-10-2012

Melinda FLOYD n/k/a Melinda Bell, Appellant, v. Ervin Todd FLOYD, Respondent.

Ciciliano & Associates, LLC Sherry B. Bowers


Ciciliano & Associates, LLC

Sherry B. Bowers

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a district court order concerning child custody. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; David A. Hardy, Judge.

Having considered the parties' arguments on appeal and the appellate record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in modifying the parties' physical custody arrangement. Wallace v. Wallace, 112 Nev. 1015, 1019, 922 P.2d 541, 543 (1996) (providing that this court reviews district court child custody decisions for an abuse of discretion). The record belies appellant's contention that substantial evidence does not support the district court's findings. Gepford v. Gepford, 116 Nev. 1033, 1036, 13 P.3d 47, 49 (2000) (explaining that a district court's factual findings will be upheld if supported by substantial evidence in the record). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Having considered respondent's request for sanctions under NRAP 3E(i), we deny the request.
We have determined that this appeal should be submitted for decision on the briefs and appellate record without oral argument. See NRAP 34(f)(1).



Summaries of

Floyd v. Floyd

Supreme Court of Nevada.
May 10, 2012
381 P.3d 612 (Nev. 2012)
Case details for

Floyd v. Floyd

Case Details

Full title:Melinda FLOYD n/k/a Melinda Bell, Appellant, v. Ervin Todd FLOYD…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: May 10, 2012

Citations

381 P.3d 612 (Nev. 2012)