From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Floyd v. Clark

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 19, 2001
801 So. 2d 325 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Summary

holding “this court has no jurisdiction to grant habeas corpus relief to one in federal custody pursuant to orders or process of the federal government”

Summary of this case from Witten v. State

Opinion

No. 1D01-4994.

December 19, 2001.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus — Original Jurisdiction.

Billy Darryl Floyd, pro se, for petitioners.

No appearance for respondent.


We conclude that this court has no jurisdiction to grant habeas corpus relief to one in federal custody pursuant to orders or process of the federal government. See Ableman v. Booth, 62 U.S. 506, 21 How. 506, 16 L.Wd. 169 (1858); Passett v. Chase, 91 Fla. 522, 107 So. 689 (1926). Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

KAHN, DAVIS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Floyd v. Clark

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 19, 2001
801 So. 2d 325 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

holding “this court has no jurisdiction to grant habeas corpus relief to one in federal custody pursuant to orders or process of the federal government”

Summary of this case from Witten v. State
Case details for

Floyd v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:Billy Darryl FLOYD and and Elizabeth Marie Rushing Floyd, Petitioners, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 19, 2001

Citations

801 So. 2d 325 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Witten v. State

We dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Floyd v. Clark, 801 So.2d 325, 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)…

Underhill-Baker v. Perez

December 12, 2003. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby dismissed as this Court has no authority…