From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flowers v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 3, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-CV-2322-G (BN) (N.D. Tex. Jan. 3, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-CV-2322-G (BN)

01-03-2020

DAMION D. FLOWERS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. An objection was filed by plaintiff. The district court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the court ACCEPTS the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED. January 3, 2020.

/s/ _________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Flowers v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 3, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-CV-2322-G (BN) (N.D. Tex. Jan. 3, 2020)
Case details for

Flowers v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:DAMION D. FLOWERS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jan 3, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-CV-2322-G (BN) (N.D. Tex. Jan. 3, 2020)