From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flowers v. Laidlaw Corporation

Supreme Court of Delaware
Mar 25, 2002
797 A.2d 678 (Del. 2002)

Opinion

No. 612, 2001.

March 25, 2002.

Court Below-Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 00A-11-002.


Appeal Dismissed.

Unpublished Opinion is below.

KENNETH M. FLOWERS, Claimant/Appellant Below-Appellant, v. LAIDLAW CORPORATION, Employer/Appellee Below-Appellee, and UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD, Appellee Below-Appellee. No. 612, 2001 In the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware. March 25, 2002

JOSEPH T. WALSH, Justice:

ORDER

This 25th day of March 2002, it appears to the Court that:

(1) Appellant Kenneth M. Flowers filed a pro se notice of appeal with this Court on December 3, 2001. Flowers has failed to file his opening brief.

SUPR. CT. R. 15(a) (i).

(2) On February 8, 2002, the Clerk issued a notice pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) directing Flowers to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to pursue the appeal diligently by filing an opening brief and appendix. Because Flowers has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required 10-day period, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.

SUPR. CT. R. 3(b) (2).

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), the within appeal is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Flowers v. Laidlaw Corporation

Supreme Court of Delaware
Mar 25, 2002
797 A.2d 678 (Del. 2002)
Case details for

Flowers v. Laidlaw Corporation

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH M. FLOWERS, Claimant/Appellant Below-Appellant, v. LAIDLAW…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Mar 25, 2002

Citations

797 A.2d 678 (Del. 2002)