From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flowers v. IDS Prop. Cas. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 29, 2013
Case No. 10-cv-15164 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 29, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 10-cv-15164

03-29-2013

JEANETTE FLOWERS, Plaintiff, v. IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, d/b/a AMERIPRISE AUTO & HOME INSURANCE, Defendant.


Paul D. Borman

United States District Judge


Mark A. Randon

United States Magistrate Judge


OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION FOR CASE EVALUATION SANCTIONS (ECF NO. 43)

On January 31, 2013, Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon issued a Report and Recommendation on IDS's Motion for Case Evaluation Sanctions. (ECF No. 43.) Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections from either party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 43), and awards IDS taxable costs and attorney fees in the total amount of $1,672.50. Plaintiff shall pay this amount within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

Paul D. Borman

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Flowers v. IDS Prop. Cas. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 29, 2013
Case No. 10-cv-15164 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Flowers v. IDS Prop. Cas. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JEANETTE FLOWERS, Plaintiff, v. IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 29, 2013

Citations

Case No. 10-cv-15164 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 29, 2013)